Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255837›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transforming Learning and Practice.

Aadhitya Sriram, Kalpana Ramachandran, Sriram Krishnamoorthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strengths and Potential Pitfalls of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatric Education and Practice.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blending Artificial Intelligence with Expertise: A Comparative Study of Concept Maps in Anatomy Education.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aadhitya SriramDepartment of Computer Science, College of Engineering, Guindy Anna University, Chennai, IND.
Kalpana RamachandranAnatomy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Sriram KrishnamoorthyUrology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping medical education by enhancing learning strategies, improving training efficiency, and offering personalized educational experiences. Traditional teaching methods, such as classroom lectures and clinical apprenticeships, face numerous challenges, including information overload, teaching quality variability, and standardisation difficulties. AI presents innovative, data-driven, and adaptive solutions to overcome these limitations, making medical training more effective and engaging. This study explores how AI can be applied in the field of medical education, also focusing on personalized learning, virtual simulations, assessment methods, and curriculum development. Additionally, it examines the challenges and ethical concerns surrounding AI integration in medical training. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze various AI-driven advancements in medical education. The study delves into adaptive learning platforms, AI-powered simulations, automated assessments, and chatbot-assisted learning. It also reviews recent technological developments to assess AI's impact on medical training and its future potential. AI enhances medical education by tailoring learning experiences to individual student performance, thereby improving knowledge retention and engagement. Virtual simulations and augmented reality provide immersive, hands-on training in a safe environment. Automated assessments facilitate efficient evaluation by offering instant feedback and grading, while AI-driven chatbots assist students in self-directed learning and clinical decision-making. Additionally, AI aids in developing dynamic, data-driven curricula that evolve with the latest medical advancements. However, concerns about data privacy, bias in various AI algorithms, over-reliance on technology, and accessibility disparities must be addressed. AI revolutionises medical education by fostering efficiency, interactivity, and personalized learning. However, its responsible implementation requires addressing ethical and logistical challenges. Future research should focus on ensuring AI fairness, equitable access, and integration with immersive technologies to optimize medical training further.

Indexed as

ai-assisted assessmentsartificial intelligencemedical educationpersonalized learningvirtual simulations

Identifiers

PMID40255837
PMCPMC12007958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.