Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255828›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Study of Conventional Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Femoral Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Mayank K Singhal, Virendra Kumar, Shilpi Misra, Praveen K Das, Manoj Giri, Suraj Chaudhary

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mayank K SinghalAnesthesiology, Shaikh-Ul-Hind Maulana Mahmood Hasan (SMMH) Medical College, Saharanpur, IND.
Virendra KumarAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, IND.
Shilpi MisraAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, IND.
Praveen K DasAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, IND.
Manoj GiriAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, IND.
Suraj ChaudharyAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background

methods

resultsThe mean time for cannulation in the conventional group was 100.90 seconds, compared to 78.16 seconds in the US-guided group. The mean number of skin punctures was 1.36 in Group U and 1.64 in Group C. The mean first-pass success rate was 64% in Group U and 42% in Group C. No incidents of posterior wall puncture were observed in Group U, while there was one incident in Group C. The incidence of femoral vein punctures was lower in Group U than in Group C.

conclusionThe study findings suggest that US-guided CFA cannulation is quicker, requires fewer attempts, and results in fewer skin punctures compared to the conventional method.

Indexed as

anatomybleedingcatheterizationfemoral arteryultrasoundvascular complications

Identifiers

PMID40255828
PMCPMC12009156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.