Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255824›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Association Between Caffeine Intake and Alzheimer's Disease Progression: A Systematic Review.

Zarbakhta Ashfaq, Zainab Younas, Eemaz Nathaniel, Abdur Rehman, Arzoo Siddiqi, Naveed Rasool, Maaz Amir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Caffeine in Aging Brains: Cognitive Enhancement, Neurodegeneration, and Emerging Concerns About Addiction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zarbakhta AshfaqInternal Medicine, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK.
Zainab YounasInternal Medicine, Imran Idrees Teaching Hospital, Sialkot, PAK.
Eemaz NathanielResearch, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Abdur RehmanSurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Arzoo SiddiqiInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Naveed RasoolInternal Medicine, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Maaz AmirInternal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing global health challenge, prompting increased attention on modifiable lifestyle factors that might influence disease progression. Among these, caffeine consumption has emerged as a potential protective factor, though the evidence remains complex and incompletely understood. This study aims to systematically review and evaluate the available evidence regarding the association between caffeine intake and AD progression. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies from database inception through October 2024. The review included studies examining the relationship between caffeine intake and AD progression in human subjects, with quality assessment performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and appropriate tools for other study designs. Findings indicated that higher caffeine intake (>200 mg/day) was consistently associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline and AD progression. Plasma caffeine levels exceeding 1200 ng/ml were notably linked to a reduced risk of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. The Mendelian randomization study suggested a protective effect of genetically predicted higher plasma caffeine levels against AD, with an odds ratio of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76-1.00), although this did not reach statistical significance. Overall, current evidence suggests a potentially protective role of moderate caffeine consumption against AD progression, particularly in individuals with MCI. The relationship appears dose-dependent and may be influenced by genetic factors and timing of exposure. Further research, particularly well-designed prospective studies and clinical trials, is needed to establish optimal dosing strategies and identify populations most likely to benefit.

Indexed as

adalzheimer’s dementiacaffeinedementiamethylxanthine

Identifiers

PMID40255824
PMCPMC12009456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.