Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255814›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case Report of Metastatic Retroperitoneal Angiosarcoma Mimicking Reactive Angioendotheliomatosis.

Theodora Douvali, Georgios Sarris, Pelagia Pediaditi, Erasmia Adamou, Eleftheria Tampouratzi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Theodora DouvaliDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Andreas Syggros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Georgios SarrisDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Andreas Syggros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Pelagia PediaditiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Andreas Syggros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Erasmia AdamouDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Andreas Syggros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Eleftheria TampouratziDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Piraeus, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosarcoma is a malignant proliferation of vascular and lymphoendothelial origin. In terms of pathology outlines, this entity may resemble other growths derived from blood vessels. Reactive angioendotheliomatosis, an intravascular proliferation, is frequently hard to discern histologically from angiosarcoma. In this study, we outline a case initially presenting with features supporting reactive angioendotheliomatosis. Clinical progression and inconclusive histopathology raised suspicion, and further investigation was decided. Computed tomography imaging revealed a large retroperitoneal tumor, and subsequent surgery with additional histological examinations of the excised mass and cutaneous samples was performed, along with immunohistostaining. As a result, diagnosis and prognosis pointed to an entirely different direction.

Indexed as

angiosarcomabiological markershistological mimickerimmunohistochemistryreactive angioendotheliomatosis

Identifiers

PMID40255814
PMCPMC12009059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.