ArticleCureus2025
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Bilateral Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Biofeedback Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in the Management of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond stapled transanal rectal resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a common disorder in developed countries. This study aims to compare the efficacy of bilateral percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (Bi-PTNS) to biofeedback therapy (BFT) in adult patients with ODS. Methods A prospective randomised control study was conducted on patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with ODS, who were referred to the Colorectal Surgery Department at a main university hospital between 2018 and 2020. Computerized 1:1 block randomization allocated patients into two groups: the bi-PTNS group and the BFT group. The Constipation Scoring System and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Score (PAC-QoL) were used to assess the severity of the patient's symptoms prior to and after treatment. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Constipation Scoring System. The secondary outcome was the PAC-QoL score. Results In total, 60 patients, with 38 females (mean of 43 years in the BFT group and 48 years in the Bi-PTNS group), were studied. Statistically significant differences were achieved in patients who underwent bi-PTNS compared to the BFT group (p < 0.001). The average improvement in the Constipation Scoring System score for the bi-PTNS group was 66.66% ± 8.44 compared to 47.36% ± 10.44 for the BFT group. The bi-PTNS group showed improvement in the PAC-QoL score (60.41% ± 4.03) compared with 42.59% ±6.25 in the BFT group. Conclusion The Bi-PTNS intervention was more effective than BFT in alleviating symptoms of OD compared to BFT, evidenced by improvements in both the Constipation Scoring System and PAC-QoL scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.