ArticleCureus2025
Correlation of Preoperative MRI and Shoulder-Specific Tests With Intraoperative Findings in Rotator Cuff Tears.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, shoulder tests, and intraoperative observations in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair at a single center in Turkey. A total of 162 patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) were included in this study. The physical examination involved the Jobe, Neer, and drop-arm tests. For patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy, tear type and stage were evaluated intraoperatively and classified as partial-thickness or full-thickness tears. Preoperative assessments using MRI documented tear types and stages. Test results and imaging findings were compared to intraoperative observations to ensure diagnostic accuracy. A study of shoulder arthroscopy patients (129 right, 33 left; mean age 58.19 ± 9.20 years) found that 77.2% had full-thickness tears and 22.8% had partial tears on preoperative MRI. Significant differences were noted in the drop-arm test results (p = 0.003). MRI proved less reliable in localizing partial RCTs. Grade changes in full-thickness tears (Patte classification, p < 0.001) and partial tears (Ellman classification, p = 0.018) were statistically significant between preoperative and intraoperative evaluations. Certain specialized shoulder tests demonstrate strong diagnostic accuracy for specific conditions; however, their effectiveness may be limited when applied in isolation. MRI is a reliable tool for diagnosing RCTs; however, its sensitivity is reduced when detecting partial tears. This discrepancy suggests that both full-thickness and partial tears may exhibit more advanced pathology at the time of surgical intervention than initially indicated by preoperative imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.