ArticleCureus2025
A Retrospective Review of the Impact of Racial Disparities and Outcomes on Urinary Anastomotic Leak in Radical Prostatectomy in a National Surgical Registry.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Racial disparities exist in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Radical prostatectomy, a common treatment for prostate cancer, has been associated with increased complications in African American men compared to other racial groups. An anastomotic urinary leak is associated with prolonged hospitalization rates, increased rates of ileus, and a longer time to regain continence. This analysis aims to evaluate differences in urinary anastomotic leak (UAL) rates between racial groups and potential predictive factors for this disparity. Methodology The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2019-2020) was utilized to compare rates of UAL in African American versus White patients. Preoperative variables examined included patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and surgical preparation. Other variables assessed included medical complications (such as pulmonary embolism), postoperative diagnosis, and surgical complications. Results A total of 11,010 radical prostatectomy patients were analyzed after applying selection criteria. African American men were more likely to be younger, current smokers, and on dialysis. African American men were also more likely to have had prior pelvic radiotherapy, diabetes mellitus, dyspnea, and hypertension controlled with medications. The odds of having a UAL in African American men after radical prostatectomy were 51% higher than in Whites (odds ratio = 1.51, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.17, p = 0.032). Prior pelvic surgery, chemotherapy within 90 days, mean operative time, and readmission rates were all associated with UAL in African American men postoperatively. Conclusions There is a significant disparity in the rate of UAL in African American versus White men and multiple factors may influence this difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.