ReviewCureus2025
Advancement in the Management of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Systemic, and Local Treatment Modalities.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLMs) present a complex therapeutic challenge requiring multimodal management strategies due to their complex tumor biology, variable disease progression, and the need to balance oncologic control with liver function preservation. This systematic review evaluates recent advancements in surgical approaches, systemic therapies, and local treatment modalities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane) for studies published between 2013 and 2024. Studies evaluating surgical techniques, perioperative outcomes, systemic therapy integration, and local treatments for sCRLM were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Analysis of nine primary studies encompassing 3,856 patients revealed evolving treatment paradigms. This review includes English-language studies (2013-2024) on adult patients (≥18 years) with sCRLM, covering RCTs, cohort, and case-control studies reporting survival, perioperative outcomes, or quality of life (≥12 months follow-up). Exclusions include case reports (<10 patients), metachronous metastases, conference abstracts, reviews without data, unclear methodology, duplicates, and animal/in-vitro studies. Staged resection demonstrated superiority over the simultaneous approach in recent analyses (win ratio 1.59, 95%CI 1.47-1.71). This indicates that patients undergoing staged resection had a 59% higher likelihood of achieving better outcomes (such as survival or fewer complications) compared to those undergoing simultaneous resection. The narrow confidence interval suggests strong statistical reliability of this finding. Minimally invasive techniques showed comparable outcomes to open surgery, with acceptable morbidity rates (21.7%) even in simultaneous resections. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with targeted agents achieved high resectability rates (97%) and significant response rates (66%). The presence of liver metastases negatively impacted immunotherapy efficacy, suggesting the need for tailored approaches. Management of sCRLM has evolved toward a more personalized approach incorporating advanced surgical techniques, targeted therapies, and novel treatment sequencing. While staged resection may offer advantages in selected cases, treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient and disease characteristics. Future research should focus on optimizing patient selection and treatment sequencing through prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.