Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255700›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Procedure and Treatment Refusal in Pediatric Practice: A Single-Center Experience at a Children's Hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Ebtehal S Alharbi, Assia S Alwabel, Nada K Algaith, Razan S Alqarzaee, Rawan H Alharbi, Samah F Alkuraydis, Ibrahim A Alrashidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ebtehal S AlharbiPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Assia S AlwabelPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Nada K AlgaithPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Razan S AlqarzaeePediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Rawan H AlharbiPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Samah F AlkuraydisPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Ibrahim A AlrashidiPediatric, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRefusal of procedures and treatment for ill children aged up to 14 years old remains a significant issue in the pediatric service. When families refuse medical treatment for their ill children for various reasons, such as financial or transportation difficulties, and concerns about severe side effects, healthcare professionals may attempt to provide information and negotiate with the family about treatment and procedure refusal and its potential consequences, as well as request consent for treatment refusal. In Saudi Arabia, there is a need for more data on treatment refusal.  Objective: We aim to determine the frequency of refusal of medical procedures and treatment in pediatric patients at a children's hospital in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.

methodsA retrospective review of 1,296 medical records were included. All patients were less than 14 years old. Data were extracted from the hospital's database system. Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 24; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY).  Results: In a total of 1,296 children attending a children's hospital in Qassim, Saudi Arabia, we found that the distribution of their age was as follows: 20.8% were one year or less, 30% were two to three years, 23.4% four to six years, and 25.8% were more than six years. The most common reasons for coming to the hospital are that 41% of children came with respiratory symptoms, 18.4% with trauma, and 15% with gastrointestinal symptoms. Respiratory infection/disease was the most commonly reported diagnosis among participants (43.5%), followed by trauma (18.6%) and gastroenteritis (15.3%). Furthermore, we found that (55.6%) refused intervention, while (39.7%) refused observation, 0.7% refused hospitalization, and 0.2% refused examination. A nasal swab was the most commonly refused procedure (28.9%), followed by blood investigations (9.9%) and IV fluids (5.7%).

conclusionRefusal of essential medical interventions based on evidence-based practice is still a critical issue in pediatric patients. Identifying the most frequent refused intervention and the reasons beyond intervention refusal is crucial to minimizing the refusal rates.

Indexed as

interventionprocedurerefusalrefusal formtreatment refusal

Identifiers

PMID40255700
PMCPMC12009505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.