ReviewCureus2025
Analog to Digital Diagnosis and Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Feasibility study of a surgical planning protocol for orthognathic surgery utilizing similarity retrieval from database: A randomized controlled trial].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Trial
- Skeletal Characteristics and Clinical Treatment Patterns in Orthognathic Surgery: A Virtual Surgical Planning-Based Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fully Guided and Free-Hand Orthognathic Surgery: Advancements, Precision, and Clinical Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthognathic surgery is a transformative procedure for correcting skeletal and dental discrepancies and enhancing facial aesthetics, functionality, and quality of life. Patients with dentofacial deformities often experience mastication, speech, and respiration challenges. Advances in diagnostic tools, treatment planning, and surgical methodologies have significantly improved surgical precision and predictability. Accurate diagnosis relies on clinical assessments, cephalometric analysis, and advanced imaging techniques such as cone beam computed tomography and three-dimensional facial scanning. Traditional surgical planning using two-dimensional cephalometry and plaster models has been largely replaced by virtual surgical planning, which enables precise simulations, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-assisted surgical splint fabrication, and improved postoperative stability. Achieving a balance between function and aesthetics is crucial. Contemporary approaches emphasize both skeletal correction and soft tissue response, with airway management being a key consideration, particularly in cases of obstructive sleep apnea. The treatment pathway includes presurgical orthodontics, maxillary or mandibular repositioning, and postoperative rehabilitation. Artificial intelligence and augmented reality-assisted surgery drive future innovations to enhance surgical accuracy and treatment customization. Despite these advancements, challenges such as treatment duration, patient compliance, psychological readiness, and costs remain. Predicting soft tissue behavior and ensuring long-term stability require further research. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of advancements in orthognathic surgery, from diagnostic innovations to modern treatment planning and emerging technologies, highlighting their impact on surgical precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes. With continuous technological progress and interdisciplinary collaboration, orthognathic surgery is moving toward greater precision, efficiency, and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.