Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255696›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Anal Fistula That Developed After Bilateral Vasectomy Complicated by Scrotal and Perineal Infections.

Adam Kemp, Kristina Guyton, Moshe Wald

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam KempDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.
Kristina GuytonDepartment of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.
Moshe WaldDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a case of an anal fistula that developed after bilateral vasectomy complicated by scrotal and perineal infections. The anatomical location of this post-vasectomy fistula was unique, as previously reported vasocutaneous fistulas after vasectomy typically occur in the scrotum. Another unusual aspect of this case was that it developed in an otherwise healthy individual, without any predisposing risk factors such as prior genitourinary surgery, radiation, or voiding dysfunction. A repeat pelvic MRI did not identify this fistula, which was ultimately diagnosed through examination under anesthesia in the operating room and successfully treated with anal fistulotomy.

Indexed as

anal fistulacomplicationsdischargeperineumvasectomy

Identifiers

PMID40255696
PMCPMC12009155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.