Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255682›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2025

Self-perceived oral health of people with and without diabetes mellitus: results of the study GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.

Laura Krause, Stefanie Seeling, Christin Heidemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura KrauseRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie SeelingRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Christin HeidemannRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-perceived oral health reflects the individual's point of view. Both subjective (e.g. pain, aesthetic aspects) and objective criteria (e.g. oral diseases, functional limitations) are included in the assessment. Oral diseases interact with noncommunicable diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Method: Data basis is the study German Health Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). In the telephone interview, respondents were asked about the presence of diabetes in the last 12 months and the state of their teeth and gums. Prevalences, prevalence ratios (PR) and p-values from Poisson regressions were calculated for people aged 18 years and older ( Results: People with diabetes were more likely to rate their oral health as fair to very poor than people without diabetes (41.2 % vs. 27.5 %). The association between diabetes and fair to very poor self-perceived oral health persisted after statistical control for sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics (PR 1.22, Discussion: Based on a population-representative sample, it was shown for the first time for Germany that there is an association between diabetes and oral health in adulthood. These results support international research findings. Greater interdisciplinary cooperation between physician groups who treat people with diabetes and dentists is required.

Indexed as

AdultsDental healthDiabetes mellitusGermanyNoncommunicable DiseasesOral healthPrevalenceSelf-assessment

Identifiers

PMID40255682
PMCPMC12004414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.