ReviewJournal of inflammation research2025
Best Practices for Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Management: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism-Based Management of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis: An Integrated Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Effect of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Pain Management in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Real-World Cohort Study.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Etiology, diagnosis, and management of chronic pancreatitis associated primary complications: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Chronic Pancreatitis in Children - Management and Outcomes.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify and synthesize high-quality evidence regarding pain management in individuals with chronic pancreatitis (CP) to serve as a reference for clinical practice interventions. Methods: A thorough review encompassing databases, clinical guidelines, and information platforms, such as UpToDate, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), guide.medlive.cn, PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data, was conducted to gather relevant evidence on pain management in CP. The search encompassed clinical decisions, evidence summaries, guidelines, systematic reviews, and expert consensus documents published up to October 2023. Two researchers independently evaluated included articles and extracted data pertinent to clinical practice. Results: In total, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria for final analysis, comprising four guidelines, two expert consensus documents, one clinical decision, and 14 systematic reviews. The evidence was categorized into seven key treatment domains: pain evaluation, drug intervention, endoscopic treatment, surgical intervention, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) therapies, other treatment modalities, and approaches tailored to specific populations. 19 individual recommendations were derived from these categories. Conclusion: This review consolidates the best available evidence for pain management in CP. However, in clinical application, the optimal intervention should be individualized, taking into account patient preferences, the healthcare institution's technical capabilities, and other relevant factors. This approach is crucial for optimizing pain management and enhancing the quality of life in individuals with CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.