ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis: A Machine Learning and Nomogram-Based Approach.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, incurable gastrointestinal disease without a gold standard for diagnosis. This study aimed to develop predictive models for diagnosing IBD, Crohn's disease (CD), and Ulcerative colitis (UC) by combining two approaches: machine learning (ML) and traditional nomogram models. Methods: Cohorts 1 and 2 comprised data from the UK Biobank (UKB), and the First Hospital of Jilin University, respectively, which represented the initial laboratory tests upon admission for 1135 and 237 CD patients, 2192 and 326 UC patients, and 1798 and 298 non-IBD patients. Cohorts 1 and 2 were used to create predictive models. The parameters of the machine learning model established by Cohorts 1 and 2 were merged, and nomogram models were developed using Logistic regression. Cohort 3 collected initial laboratory tests from 117 CD patients, 197 UC patients, and 241 non IBD patients at a tertiary hospital in different regions of China for external testing of three nomogram models. Results: For Cohort 1, ML-IBD-1, ML-CD-1 and ML-UC-1 models developed using the LightGBM algorithm demonstrated exceptional discrimination (ML-IBD-1: AUC = 0.788; ML-CD-1: AUC = 0.772; ML-UC-1: AUC = 0.841). For Cohort 2, ML-IBD-2, ML-CD-2, and ML-UC-2 models developed using XGBoost and Logistic Regression algorithms demonstrated exceptional discrimination (ML-IBD-2: AUC = 0.894; ML-CD-2: AUC = 0.932; ML-UC-2: AUC = 0.778). The nomogram model exhibits good diagnostic capability (nomogram-IBD: AUC=0.778, 95% CI (0.688-0.868); nomogram-CD: AUC=0.744, 95% CI (0.710-0.778); nomogram-UC, AUC=0.702, 95% CI (0.591-0.814)). The predictive ability of the three models was validated in cohort 3 (nomogram-IBD: AUC=0.758, 95% CI (0.683-0.832); nomogram-CD: AUC=0.791, 95% CI (0.717-0.865); nomogram-UC, AUC=0.817, 95% CI (0.702-0.932)). Conclusion: This study utilized three cohorts and developed risk prediction models for IBD, CD, and UC with good diagnostic capability, based on conventional laboratory data using ML and nomogram.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.