SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
The safety and efficacy of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis vaccine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat) are major pathogens implicated in bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Their involvement contributes to antibiotic resistance and poses significant immune challenges, underscoring the need for targeted vaccine strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines in COPD patients. Research design and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the safety and efficacy of NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines for COPD were systematically searched across four databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Medline) from inception to October 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects or fixed-effects models, with subgroup analyses to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity. Results: This analysis included eight RCTs involving 1,574 participants, primarily conducted in Europe ( Conclusion: Although the NTHi-Mcat/NTHi vaccines were well-tolerated in COPD patients, they did not significantly reduce the risk of exacerbations or mortality. These findings suggest that further research is needed to validate these results and identify potential subgroups that may derive clinical benefit. Systematic review registration: The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023381488).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.