ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Using experience-based co-design approach to address mental health issues among healthcare workers and leaders in long-term care.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engaging Service Users in Co-Designing a Nurse-Led Weight Talk Tool for Low- and Medium-Secure Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Participatory Intervention Development Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Inspiring That EUREKA Moment: The Importance of Patient Co-Design of Outputs from interRAI Assessments.Healthcare management forum · 2026Article
- Burnout and patient safety: navigating between exaggerated evidence and warranted assertability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Expectations for a co-designed virtual immersive program for older adults with dementia in long-term care: a qualitative study with residents, family, and staff.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Coping in crisis: a qualitative study of stress and resilience in Ontario's long-term care workforce.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Burnout remains a critical issue within the long-term care (LTC) sector, underscoring the urgent need for early detection and prevention strategies targeting the healthcare workforce. This paper aimed to describe the processes of uncovering the underlying drivers of burnout and distress among LTC workers, providing a foundational understanding to inform the development of a Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Materials and methods: Using an experience-based co-design approach, 11 focus groups were held with a purposive sample of 24 Ontario LTC workers between July 2023 and October 2024. Each session, lasting 2 h, included 4-5 participants representing a diverse range of professional and occupational roles, including personal support workers, nurses, social workers, and administrators or leaders. The objectives of this approach were two-fold: (1) to explore the work-related experiences of LTC workers; and (2) to examine their perceptions of existing burnout and distress tools, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, to assess their relevance and applicability within the LTC context. Each focus group session was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An iterative process generated codes from the transcripts that culminated in a thematic framework of key findings. Results: Four interrelated themes emerged: (1) challenges inherent in the LTC work environment; (2) the impacts of workplace pressures on employee health and well-being; (3) managing psychosocial risk factors in the workplace; and (4) the need for a context-specific tool to assess burnout in LTC settings. Participants provided in-depth perspectives on their roles within the LTC sector, highlighting the profound impact of burnout on their well-being and the persistent challenges they face in their work environment. Discussion/conclusion: The findings highlight the pressing need for tailored systemic interventions to effectively address burnout and moral distress among LTC workers and leaders. By employing a co-design approach, this study offers critical insights into the lived experiences of these workers, informing the development and refinement of burnout assessment tools to better reflect the unique needs of this workforce. Developing a BAT, co-created by and for LTC workers, coupled with robust support systems, is crucial to addressing the rising distress and fostering resilience within this vital sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.