Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Using experience-based co-design approach to address mental health issues among healthcare workers and leaders in long-term care.

Sheila A Boamah, Mawukoenya Theresa Sedzro, Humayun Kabir, Brenda Vrkljan, Scott Mitchell, Laura De La Torre Pérez, Marilina Santero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sheila A BoamahSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mawukoenya Theresa SedzroFaculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Humayun KabirDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Brenda VrkljanSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Scott MitchellCentres for Learning, Research and Innovation in Long-Term Care at the Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Laura De La Torre PérezMethodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health PhD Program, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marilina SanteroDepartment of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Burnout remains a critical issue within the long-term care (LTC) sector, underscoring the urgent need for early detection and prevention strategies targeting the healthcare workforce. This paper aimed to describe the processes of uncovering the underlying drivers of burnout and distress among LTC workers, providing a foundational understanding to inform the development of a Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Materials and methods: Using an experience-based co-design approach, 11 focus groups were held with a purposive sample of 24 Ontario LTC workers between July 2023 and October 2024. Each session, lasting 2 h, included 4-5 participants representing a diverse range of professional and occupational roles, including personal support workers, nurses, social workers, and administrators or leaders. The objectives of this approach were two-fold: (1) to explore the work-related experiences of LTC workers; and (2) to examine their perceptions of existing burnout and distress tools, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, to assess their relevance and applicability within the LTC context. Each focus group session was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. An iterative process generated codes from the transcripts that culminated in a thematic framework of key findings. Results: Four interrelated themes emerged: (1) challenges inherent in the LTC work environment; (2) the impacts of workplace pressures on employee health and well-being; (3) managing psychosocial risk factors in the workplace; and (4) the need for a context-specific tool to assess burnout in LTC settings. Participants provided in-depth perspectives on their roles within the LTC sector, highlighting the profound impact of burnout on their well-being and the persistent challenges they face in their work environment. Discussion/conclusion: The findings highlight the pressing need for tailored systemic interventions to effectively address burnout and moral distress among LTC workers and leaders. By employing a co-design approach, this study offers critical insights into the lived experiences of these workers, informing the development and refinement of burnout assessment tools to better reflect the unique needs of this workforce. Developing a BAT, co-created by and for LTC workers, coupled with robust support systems, is crucial to addressing the rising distress and fostering resilience within this vital sector.

Indexed as

burnoutco-designexperiential researchhealthcare workerslong-term caremental healthretention

Identifiers

PMID40255590
PMCPMC12006187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.