ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Identification of the instrumental quality and the sensory difference between homemade cooked rice and aseptic-packaged cooked rice.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rice Quality: A Multidimensional Evaluation Integrating Ecology, Management and Genetic Regulation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identification of the instrumental quality and the sensory difference between homemade cooked rice and aseptic-packaged cooked rice.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumers often prefer homemade cooked rice (HMCR), which differs from aseptic-packaged cooked rice (APCR). This study provides sensory and instrumental data for commercial APCR and discusses physicochemical factors that affect sensory differences in commercial APCR and HMCR. The color revealed that yellowness and redness were influenced by rice embryos. Additionally, the poor appearance preference was associated with low grain wholesomeness, with a strong negative correlation between grain wholesomeness and appearance quality in cooked rice. The textural properties varied among samples, but there were no significant differences in texture preference. A major difference between HMCR and APCR was observed in the aroma profile. HMCR exhibited excellent aroma preference, particularly in terms of roasted and sweet flavors, which were key factors in aroma preferences. However, the presence of green and fatty flavor compounds negatively impacted the aroma quality. Conversely, roasted flavor compounds such as 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol positively contributed to the aroma quality of cooked rice. To improve consumer preference for APCR, efforts should focus on reducing green and fatty flavors while enhancing roasted flavors. By adjusting the flavor profile, the aroma quality of APCR can be enhanced, leading to greater consumer satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.