ArticleACS photonics2025
Hybrid Iterating-Averaging Low Photon Budget Gabor Holographic Microscopy.
Article in ACS photonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase and absorbance retrieval in X-ray holographic microscopy under weak illumination using physics-driven neural networks.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Hybrid Iterating-Averaging Low Photon Budget Gabor Holographic Microscopy.ACS photonics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving high-contrast, label-free imaging with minimal impact on live cell culture behavior remains a primary challenge in quantitative phase imaging (QPI). By enabling imaging under low illumination intensities (low photon budget, LPB), it is possible to minimize cell photostimulation, phototoxicity, and photodamage while supporting long-term and high-speed observations. However, LPB imaging introduces significant difficulties in QPI due to high levels of camera shot noise and quantification noise. Digital in-line holographic microscopy (DIHM) is a QPI technique known for its robustness against LPB data. However, simultaneous minimization of shot noise and inherent in DIHM twin image perturbation remains a critical challenge. In this study, we present the iterative Gabor averaging (IGA) algorithm, a novel approach that integrates iterative phase retrieval with frame averaging to effectively suppress both twin image disturbance and shot noise in multiframe DIHM. The IGA algorithm achieves this by leveraging an iterative process that reconstructs high-fidelity phase images while selectively averaging camera shot noise across frames. Our simulations demonstrate that IGA consistently outperforms conventional methods, achieving superior reconstruction accuracy, particularly under high-noise conditions. Experimental validations involving high-speed imaging of dynamic sperm cells and a static phase test target measurement under low illumination further confirmed IGA's efficacy. The algorithm also proved successful for optically thin samples, which often yield low signal-to-noise holograms even at high photon budgets. These advancements make IGA a powerful tool for photostimulation-free, high-speed imaging of dynamic biological samples and enhance the ability to image samples with extremely low optical thickness, potentially transforming biomedical and environmental applications in low-light settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.