ArticleJB & JS open access
Obstetric Demographics for Female Orthopaedic Surgeons Compared with the General Population and Peer Physicians.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical training occurs during optimal childbearing years. While unique family planning challenges for surgeons are becoming more widely reported, a gap in knowledge remains regarding fertility and pregnancy risks for each subspecialty. This study assessed reported experiences and opinions of orthopaedic surgeons compared with other physicians and the general population regarding pregnancy complications, infertility, and maternal support. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was distributed to female physicians through private physician social media groups from June 2021-August 2021. The survey queried pregnancy demographics and complications, infertility diagnosis and treatment, workplace environment, and prior education on these topics. Results were compared between orthopaedic surgeons and the general population and other physicians. Results: Four thousand six hundred thirty-eight female physicians completed the survey, including 141 orthopaedic surgeons (3%). Compared with the general population, orthopaedic surgeons had children later in life (34.1 vs. 23.6 years; p < 0.0001), were more likely to have had a miscarriage (40% vs. 19.1%; p < 0.0001), undergone infertility evaluation (40.1% vs. 8.8%; p < 0.0001) or infertility treatment (31.9% vs. 12.7%; p < 0.0001), and had a preterm birth (19.9% vs. 10.2%; p < 0.0001). Forty-six percent of orthopaedic surgeons reported a pregnancy complication, and 6% received education on risks of delaying pregnancy. Compared with other physicians, orthopaedic surgeons were older at their first pregnancy (34.1 vs. 31.7, p < 0.0001), had fewer children (1.8 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0094), were more often discouraged from starting a family during training and practice (56% vs. 42%, p = 0.0007), and worked more hours per week while pregnant (59.1 vs. 54.1, p = 0.0002). Conclusions: Female orthopaedic surgeons may have increased risks of miscarriage, infertility, and preterm birth compared with the general population. In addition, orthopaedic surgeons report experiencing more negative workplace attitudes and longer working hours while pregnant compared with physician peers. The culture of orthopaedic surgery must continue to evolve to better support women physicians with pregnancy and family planning. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.