ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Risk prediction model for precancerous gastric lesions based on magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging features.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine-learning model for staging autoimmune gastritis based on endoscopic and serological features.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Deep learning for scene understanding in mitochondrial dysregulation and blood cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to construct and validate diagnostic models for the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) staging systems using three different methodologies based on magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) features, to evaluate model performance, and to analyse risk factors for high-risk OLGA/OLGIM stages. Methods: We enrolled 356 patients who underwent white-light endoscopy and ME-NBI at the Department of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, between January 2022 and September 2023. Clinical data were recorded. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyse differences in endoscopic features between OLGA/OLGIM stages. Variables showing statistical significance underwent collinearity diagnosis before model inclusion. We constructed predictive models using Bayesian stepwise discrimination, random forest, and XGBoost algorithms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted using Python 3.12.4. Model accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for comprehensive validation. Results: All three models demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with random forest and XGBoost models showing marginally superior accuracy, AUC values, and sensitivity compared with the Bayesian stepwise discrimination model. For OLGA staging, the AUC values were 0.928, 0.958, and 0.966, with accuracies of 0.854, 0.902, and 0.918 for Bayesian, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. For OLGIM staging, the corresponding AUC values were 0.924, 0.975, and 0.979, with accuracies of 0.910, 0.938, and 0.927. Risk factors for high-risk OLGA included lesion location (subcardial and lower body greater curvature), intestinal metaplasia patches, lesion size, demarcation line (DL), and margin regularity of micro-capillary demarcation line (MCDL). Risk factors for high-risk OLGIM included Conclusions: All three models demonstrated robust accuracy and predictive capability, confirming that conventional white-light endoscopy combined with ME-NBI features provides valuable diagnostic reference for clinical risk assessment of precancerous gastric lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.