Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255428›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Risk prediction model for precancerous gastric lesions based on magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging features.

Jingna Tao, Zhongmian Zhang, Linghan Meng, Liju Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, Zhihong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingna Tao *Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhongmian Zhang *Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linghan Meng *Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liju ZhangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiaqi WangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhihong LiDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to construct and validate diagnostic models for the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) staging systems using three different methodologies based on magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) features, to evaluate model performance, and to analyse risk factors for high-risk OLGA/OLGIM stages. Methods: We enrolled 356 patients who underwent white-light endoscopy and ME-NBI at the Department of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, between January 2022 and September 2023. Clinical data were recorded. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyse differences in endoscopic features between OLGA/OLGIM stages. Variables showing statistical significance underwent collinearity diagnosis before model inclusion. We constructed predictive models using Bayesian stepwise discrimination, random forest, and XGBoost algorithms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted using Python 3.12.4. Model accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for comprehensive validation. Results: All three models demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with random forest and XGBoost models showing marginally superior accuracy, AUC values, and sensitivity compared with the Bayesian stepwise discrimination model. For OLGA staging, the AUC values were 0.928, 0.958, and 0.966, with accuracies of 0.854, 0.902, and 0.918 for Bayesian, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. For OLGIM staging, the corresponding AUC values were 0.924, 0.975, and 0.979, with accuracies of 0.910, 0.938, and 0.927. Risk factors for high-risk OLGA included lesion location (subcardial and lower body greater curvature), intestinal metaplasia patches, lesion size, demarcation line (DL), and margin regularity of micro-capillary demarcation line (MCDL). Risk factors for high-risk OLGIM included Conclusions: All three models demonstrated robust accuracy and predictive capability, confirming that conventional white-light endoscopy combined with ME-NBI features provides valuable diagnostic reference for clinical risk assessment of precancerous gastric lesions.

Indexed as

Bayesianprecancerous gastric lesionsprediction modelrandom forestXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40255428
PMCPMC12006015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.