ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Deep cross entropy fusion for pulmonary nodule classification based on ultrasound Imagery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung cancer multimodal auxiliary diagnosis based on entropy weight decision fusion.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules in ultrasound remains a clinical challenge due to insufficient diagnostic precision. We propose the Deep Cross-Entropy Fusion (DCEF) model to enhance classification accuracy. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 135 patients (27 benign, 68 malignant training; 11 benign, 29 malignant testing) was analyzed. Manually annotated ultrasound ROIs were preprocessed and input into DCEF, which integrates ResNet, DenseNet, VGG, and InceptionV3 via entropy-based fusion. Performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Results: DCEF achieved an AUC of 0.873 (training) and 0.792 (testing), outperforming traditional methods. Test metrics included 71.5% accuracy, 70.69% sensitivity, 70.58% specificity, 72.55% precision, and 71.13% F1-score, demonstrating robust diagnostic capability. Discussion: DCEF's multi-architecture fusion enhances diagnostic reliability for ultrasound-based nodule assessment. While promising, validation in larger multi-center cohorts is needed to address single-center data limitations. Future work will explore next-generation architectures and multi-modal integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.