ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Defining long-term survivors in metastatic lung cancer: insights from a Delphi study in Spain.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical recommendations for exercise and nutrition in patients with lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Defining patients living long-term with incurable cancer: A modified hybrid Delphi study.Palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Commentary: Defining long-term survivors in metastatic lung cancer: insights from a Delphi study in Spain.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The improvement in survival rates in metastatic lung cancer (mLC) has increased the number of survivors' special care needs. This study aimed to define and characterise these long-term survivors. A Delphi method with two successive rounds was conducted to reach a consensus (defined as an agreement ≥ 70%) on 56 items among 41 medical oncologists. The items included the definition of long-term survivors, their common characteristics, and oncological and non-oncological implications. The experts had an average age of 46 years, 53.7% were men, 90.2% attended for thoracic tumours, 40% had more than 15 years' experience in mLC, and 56.1% of managing > 50 patients/month. Consensus reached 53.6% in the first round and 73.2% in the second. The definition of long-term survivors reached 58.3% consensus, defined as overall survival ≥ 3 years and/or progression-free survival ≥ 2 years. Identification of common features obtained 76.2% consensus on adenocarcinoma subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer, high PD-L1 expression, absence of brain metastasis, and fewer than two metastatic locations. Consensus was reached on specialized medical follow-up to detect immune-mediated toxicities and second neoplasms (87.8%), on pharmacological/non-pharmacological treatment for fatigue (82.9%) and sexual dysfunction (85.4%); and also on the importance of support for work and social adaptation (92.7%), integration of primary and hospital care (90.2%), implementation of quality-of-life programmes (92.7%) and electronic media (73.2%). This consensus identifies common characteristics and highlights relevant implications that should guide the follow-up and clinical management of these patients, ensuring better care and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.