ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Strengthening health technology assessment for cancer treatments in Europe by integrating causal inference and target trial emulation.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment switching in oncology evidence synthesis: a systematic review of meta-analytical practices incorporating time-dependent confounding, censoring bias, and patient-level variability.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Target trial emulation: A practical framework for credible real-world evidence of healthcare interventions.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Between Rigor and Relevance: Why the EU HTA Guidelines on Indirect Comparisons Miss the Mark.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Current status of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment capacity in county-level medical institutions in Sichuan Province, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for reimbursement of all new cancer drugs in the European Union (EU) will be evaluated for all member states by a central European HTA starting in 2025. EU HTA guidelines for applicants under these new regulations put the focus on meta-analysis of aggregated randomized trial data and are in contrast with the growing number of cancer drug approvals by drug regulators that are based on single arm studies and the needs in the rapidly evolving field of oncological drug development. We advocate to broaden the methodological approaches for HTA by including observational data based causal inference methodology and target trial emulation into the assessments of comparative effectiveness. Causal inference estimates causal estimands, effect measures that reflect a population level effect in terms of contrasts of counterfactual outcomes in the same patients and are directly measured in the target population by modeling of hypothetical intervention. Target trial emulation allows with the use of causal inference to estimate causal effects by mimicking pragmatic trials that evolve apart from randomization like a trial. We illustrate the potential of causal inference for HTA and provide an introduction into causal inference methodology for health scientists involved in HTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.