ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Impact of hepatic steatosis on mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, end-stage liver disease and HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B: a United States cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absence of steatosis combined with cardiometabolic risk factors confers the highest hepatocellular carcinoma risk in treated chronic hepatitis B.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Etiology-Based Treatment for Unresectable/Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focus on Viral Hepatitis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Concurrent Steatotic Liver Disease and Prognosis After Curative Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is prevalent among individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB), yet its impact on clinical outcomes remains controversial. Methods: We used electronic health record data from 98 US healthcare-delivery systems to compare adults with (CHB-SLD) and without SLD (CHB-wo-SLD) from 2000 to 2024. We applied 1: 1 propensity score matching to balance cohorts by demographic and clinical characteristics. We further performed sensitivity analyses in the presence or absence of cirrhosis. We compared incidence rates (IR) and hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), end-stage liver disease (ESLD) events, and detectable HBsAg and HBeAg as markers of seroclearance. Results: Among 124,932 individuals with CHB (12.43% CHB-SLD), there were 470,707 person-years of observations (median follow-up 2.95 years). Compared with CHB, individuals with CHB-SLD had a lower mortality risk (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.40-0.48). Fibrosis risk was higher among those with CHB-SLD (vs CHB-wo-SLD) (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.71-2.19); however, cirrhosis risk was comparable (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18) between cohorts, while HCC risk was lower in the CHB-SLD cohort (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.96). The CHB-SLD cohort also had significantly reduced risks of ESLD events, including ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome (all p < 0.001). Additionally, detectable HBsAg and HBeAg IRs and HRs were lower among CHB-SLD compared to the CHB-wo-SLD cohort: 26.83 vs. 31.96 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87) and 8.52 vs. 11.36 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85), respectively. Sensitivity analyses stratified by cirrhosis status supported these findings. Conclusion: CHB-SLD status was associated with more favorable outcomes, highlighting the complexity of CHB and SLD interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.