ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
PENG Block: A superior alternative for pain management in intracapsular hip fractures.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05377541 (Comparison of PENG Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in the Postoperative Pain Control of Hip Capsular Fracture), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of PENG Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in the Postoperative Pain Control of Hip Capsular Fracture
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reappraising the fascia iliaca compartment block and pericapsular nerve group block for geriatric hip fractures: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of regional analgesic techniques for pain management after hip surgery; however, no clear superiority between these techniques has been established. A key limitation of these studies is the lack of differentiation between fracture subtypes. This prospective, comparative cohort study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two regional techniques-pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and suprainguinal iliac fascia block (FICB)-in providing perisurgical analgesia for intracapsular femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing elective surgery for intracapsular femoral fractures were randomly assigned to receive either a PENG block or an FICB block, each with 15 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Intradural anesthesia and conventional intravenous analgesia were administered during surgery. The primary outcome was pain scores in the recovery room and 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the need for intravenous opioid rescue medication during the first 24 hours. Results: The PENG group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores compared to the FICB group both immediately after surgery ( Conclusions: The PENG block provides superior postoperative analgesia for intracapsular femoral fractures compared to the FICB block following hip surgery, with reduced opioid consumption observed in the PENG group. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05377541.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.