Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255348›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

Comparative Study of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Teaching Methods on Medical Students' Outcomes in Pediatrics Clerkships.

Hongjun Ba, Lingling Xu, Yufen Gu, Yijuan Li, Xiaoyun Jiang, Xiaoyu Li, Shujuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongjun Ba *Department of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lingling Xu *Department of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-6145
Yufen GuDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yijuan LiDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyun JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu LiDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Shujuan LiDepartment of Pediatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an engaging, student-centered teaching approach that has become increasingly popular in the field of medical education. Particularly during clinical rotations, PBL is thought to enhance students' clinical reasoning and skills. However, the impact of PBL in pediatric clerkships has not been fully explored. Objective: This study aimed to assess the influence of PBL on the clinical skills of medical interns during pediatric rotations, comparing the outcomes between PBL and traditional teaching methods. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 medical interns (38 male, 34 female) participating in pediatric rotations at our hospital between November 2023 and September 2024. The interns were assigned at random to either the PBL group (36 students) or the traditional teaching group (36 students), with stratification based on baseline clinical examination scores. Both groups participated in a two-week pediatric internship, encountering identical clinical cases. The PBL group received instruction supplemented with PBL, while the traditional group received bedside teaching. The outcomes were evaluated using a theoretical knowledge exam, Mini-CEX assessments, and a PBL group satisfaction survey. Results: The results of the theoretical knowledge exam showed no significant difference between the groups (PBL group: 90.25 ± 2.15, traditional group: 89.78 ± 2.14, p > 0.05), indicating similar support for theoretical learning. Mini-CEX evaluations demonstrated that the PBL group showed significant improvements in history taking, medical decision-making, physician-patient interactions, and comprehensive clinical skills compared to the traditional group. Feedback from the PBL group was overwhelmingly positive, with students highlighting significant improvements in clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills. Conclusion: PBL significantly enhanced clinical skills in pediatric clerkships, particularly in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and communication. Although both teaching methods supported theoretical learning equally, PBL fostered greater student engagement and deeper learning, suggesting that it could be a valuable model for future medical education.

Indexed as

clinical clerkshippediatricsproblem-based learningteaching methods

Identifiers

PMID40255348
PMCPMC12009580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.