Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255345›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Situation analysis of evidence-informed health decision-making in Lao PDR: the case of health technology assessment.

Sysavanh Phommachanh, Manit Sittimart, Aparna Ananthakrishnan, Souphaphone Vongsack, Soudavanh Soysouvanh, Elizabeth A Ashley, Yot Teerawattananon, Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak, Mayfong Mayxay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sysavanh PhommachanhUnit for Health Evidence and Policy, Institute for Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR.
Manit SittimartHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Aparna AnanthakrishnanHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Souphaphone VongsackUnit for Health Evidence and Policy, Institute for Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR.
Soudavanh SoysouvanhUnit for Health Evidence and Policy, Institute for Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR.
Elizabeth A AshleyLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Saudamini Vishwanath DabakHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Mayfong MayxayUnit for Health Evidence and Policy, Institute for Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Lao PDR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in using evidence to inform policy in Lao PDR, which is in the process of establishing a unit for Health Technology Assessment (HTA). This situation analysis aims to explore the current landscape of evidence generation and translation into policy decisions in Lao PDR using the case of HTA. Methods: A mixed methods approach was applied. Self-administered questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted with different stakeholder groups. Data were analysed thematically and summarised in tabular form. Findings: There were 212 responses to the survey and 38 stakeholders were interviewed between March and September 2021. The health policy decision process in Lao PDR is based on consultation meetings, influenced by external experts and/or companies, without consistent use of evidence. There remains a lack of human resource and infrastructure for health evidence to inform policy. Two-thirds of the respondents to the survey strongly agreed that HTA helps in efficient allocation of health resources and improving quality of healthcare. Half of the respondents perceived that HTA can impact the government budget and transparency, which was consistent with findings from the qualitative data. Use of economic considerations was limited in Lao PDR. HTA was seen to apply to policy areas, notably for reimbursement. Only a few organisations can supply health evidence and HTA output, and more training and multi-disciplinary collaboration is needed to conduct and produce HTA and other health evidence to inform policy in Lao PDR. Funding for HTA remains a concern. Interpretation: Improvement of the health policy decision process is urgently needed in Lao PDR. Limited capacity to conduct HTA as well as institutional considerations need to be addressed. Recent efforts towards this end through the establishment of a unit focused on HTA, capacity building activities and international collaborations are promising to establish evidence-informed priority setting for health policy and can also benefit from regional efforts in this direction. This type of approach to assess the situation for evidence use will be beneficial for other countries embarking on this path. Funding: Wellcome Trust, the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), and the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

Indexed as

Evidence-informed decision makingHealth policyHTALao PDRPriority setting

Identifiers

PMID40255345
PMCPMC12008126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.