Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255336›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Oral anticoagulant timing and hospitalization in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.

Chendi Cui, Laura Curry, Nisha Singh, Ning An Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chendi CuiPremier Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States.
Laura CurryPremier Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States.
Nisha SinghBristol-Myers Squibb, Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, United States.
Ning An RosenthalPremier Applied Sciences, Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) significantly increases ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risks. Despite the proven efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in reducing these risks, their underutilization highlights a gap in clinical practice. This study examined OAC utilization patterns within the first year after NVAF diagnosis in patients without prior OAC use and the association between the timing of OAC initiation and the risk of all-cause and stroke/SE-specific hospitalizations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Premier Healthcare Database and linked claims from 1/1/2017-3/31/2021. Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, without prior OAC use, were included. Results: Of 23,148 adults with newly diagnosed NVAF, 11,059 (47.8%) initiated OAC within one year. OAC users predominantly had cardiovascular disease and risk factors, whereas non-OAC users had higher rates of malignancy and dementia. Early OAC initiation (74.9% during the index visit) was linked to lower hospitalization risks compared to those initiating later (29.2% vs. 45.9% for all-cause, Conclusions: This study highlights OAC underutilization in NVAF patients and suggests early initiation may lower hospitalization rates. The findings emphasize the need for further research into real-world compliance with OAC guidelines and call for further research to confirm the benefits of early initiation. Personalized management strategies that consider individual patient profiles are recommended.

Indexed as

hospitalizationnonvalvular atrial fibrillationoral anticoagulantsreal-world evidencetiming of initiation

Identifiers

PMID40255336
PMCPMC12006160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.