Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255320›Full record

Trial reportOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025

The effects of combining electrical stimulation of the calf and thigh muscles on WOMAC pain in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

Samuel Briggs-Price, George Mills, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Enya Daynes, Charlotte Gerlis, Lorna E Latimer, Colin Esler, Darren Targett, Sally J Singh

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel Briggs-PriceCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
George MillsCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Linzy Houchen-WolloffCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Enya DaynesCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Charlotte GerlisCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lorna E LatimerCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Colin EslerOrthopaedics, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, United Kingdom.
Darren TargettPrimoris Contract Solutions Ltd, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Sally J SinghCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of a NMES device in improving pain and function for individuals with KOA. Method: This was a randomised, sham-controlled, superiority trial recruiting individuals with symptomatic KOA, with both participants and outcome assessors blinded to the treatment allocation. Participants were randomised to receive either self-administered NMES, consisting of quadriceps (5 times a week) and footplate stimulation (7 times a week), or a sham device for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain domain at week 8. Results: 179 participants were randomised; 50.8 ​% female, mean (SD) age 66.9 (8.7) years. 164 attended the follow up visit. No difference in the WOMAC pain domain was seen between groups (-0.7; 95 ​% CI: -1.5, 0.1; P ​= ​0.10), though within group improvements were reported in both groups (NMES: -1.5; 95 ​% CI: -2.0, 0.8; P ​< ​0.01, sham: -0.8; 95 ​% CI: -1.4, 0.2; P ​< ​0.01). There were no differences in strength, exercise and functional capacity, swelling, health related quality of life or anxiety and depression between groups. Sub-group analysis for NMES compliance or recruitment source did not change response in primary outcome. Conclusion: Use of an NMES device on the quadriceps and plantar flexors did not enhance pain relief or improve function over the sham control in people with KOA.

Indexed as

Electrical stimulationKnee osteoarthritisNMESRandomised controlled trialSham

Identifiers

PMID40255320
PMCPMC12008679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.