ArticleBioinformation2025
Effect of diode laser on peri-implantitis by monitoring gingival crevicular fluid levels.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of salivary caspase-3 biomarker in peri-implantitis among type 2 diabetic patients.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Quality of life associated with oral health among patients with single versus two-implant retained mandibular overdentures.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Osseodensification over standard drilling methods on implant stability and crestal bone level.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Stress distribution on platform switched dental implant technique with different bone type.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Untreated peri-implantitis results into implant failure. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the effect of diode laser on peri-implantitis and levels of crevicular fluid biomarkers. Hence, this study involved 20 participants, with a total of 24 dental implants exhibiting peri-implantitis on the laser group (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10). Clinical parameters around the implants were evaluated and samples of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) were collected at baseline, as well as at 3-month and 6-month follow-up intervals. These groups exhibited significant differences in terms of periodontal parameters and IL-1β levels in PICF at the 3rd and 6th month follow-up visits showing diode lasers as a dependable tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.