Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255292›Full record

ArticleBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

Cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: what is new.

Marta Alexandra Carvalho da Silva, Rui Miguel Mouro de Santos Rolo, Maria Joana Pereira Catarata, Eva Filipa de Sousa Antunes Dias Padrão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interstitial lung diseases.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta Alexandra Carvalho da SilvaPulmonology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Rui Miguel Mouro de Santos RoloPulmonology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-8035
Maria Joana Pereira CatarataPulmonology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Eva Filipa de Sousa Antunes Dias PadrãoPulmonology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive and fatal interstitial fibrosing disease and, despite some well-known risk factors, its cause is still unknown. Cough is experienced by most patients and is commonly chronic and refractory, having a significant impact on quality of life. Its aetiology is complex, combining factors related to interstitial lung disease (ILD) such as an increased sensitivity of cough-sensitive nerves, structural lung changes and inflammation, genetic factors, several comorbidities and medication-adverse effects. Despite the therapeutic advancements in IPF over the past decade with the introduction of antifibrotic drugs that slow disease progression, effective treatment options for cough in IPF remain unavailable. Cough management often relies on empirical approaches based on studies involving chronic cough patients of unspecified causes and ILD physicians' personal experiences. Different classes of medications have been tried over time and, more recently, the focus has turned to neuromodulators and opioids, but several studies have shown suboptimal efficacy in cough. On the other hand, these drugs are associated with significant physical, psychological and economic burdens. However, the future brings us hope to the extent that most current ongoing clinical trials are using new molecules and some have demonstrated promising antitussive effects. This review aims to provide a practical guide to understanding and managing cough in IPF patients, presenting pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches over time, as well as those treatments that are currently being investigated in clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID40255292
PMCPMC12004257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.