Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255291›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2025

The lung microbiome in interstitial lung disease.

Sheridan G Mikhail, David N O'Dwyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inter-Organ Communication in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Systemic Modifiers of a Lung-Centered Disease.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dose-dependent protective effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Interstitial lung diseases.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheridan G MikhailDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David N O'DwyerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Gut Microbiota and Host Regulatory Cross-Talk in Pulmonary FibrosisR01HL162659 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI O'DWYER, DAVID NOEL · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous chronic form of lung disease. The pathogenesis of ILD is poorly understood and a common form of ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with poor prognosis. There is evidence for substantial dysregulated immune responses in ILD. The microbiome is a key regulator of the immune response, and the lung microbiome correlates with alveolar immunity and clinical outcomes in ILD. Most observational lung microbiome studies have been conducted in patients with IPF. A consistent observation in these studies is that the bacterial burden of the lung is elevated in patients with IPF and predicts mortality. However, our understanding of the mechanism is incomplete and our understanding of the role of the lung microbiome in other forms of ILD is limited. The microbiomes of the oropharynx and gut may have implications for the lung microbiome and pulmonary immunity in ILD but require substantial further research. Here, we discuss the studies supporting a role for the lung microbiome in the pathogenesis of IPF, and briefly describe the putative role of the oral-lung axis and the gut-lung axis in ILD.

Identifiers

PMID40255291
PMCPMC12004254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.