ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2025
Comparison of microbiome community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of different renewable solid wastes.
Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing Anaerobic Digesters' Function and Performance: From Meta-Omics to Integrated Meta-Omics Analyses.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Review
- Bioelectrochemical enhancement of anaerobic digestion under heavy metal stress: a comparative study of AD and AD-MEC systems.Biodegradation · 2026Article
- Optimizing biogas production from poultry manure and cocoa pod husks co-digestion: implications for circular bioeconomy and decentralized energy systems in West Africa.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analysed the effect of the different lignocellulose composition of two crop substrates on the structure and dynamics of bacterial communities during anaerobic digestion (AD) processes for biogas production. To this end, cereal grains and grape pomace biomasses were analysed in parallel in an experimental AD bench-scale system to define and compare their metagenomic profiles for different experimental time intervals. The bacterial community structure and dynamics during the AD process were detected and characterised using high-resolution whole metagenomic shotgun analyses. Statistical evaluation identified 15 strains as specific to two substrates. Some strains, like
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.