Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40255228›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2025

Ultra-Low Dose Computed Tomography Imaging in Quantifying Bone Trauma and Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Fariba Zarei, Seyedeh Marzieh Ahmadi, Saber Dehbani-Zadeh, Anahita Jafari, Vyas Akondi, Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Seyed Alireza Mirhosseini, Rezvan Ravanfar Haghighi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ultra-low dose post-operative CT protocol after acetabular fixation has excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fariba ZareiMedical Imaging Research Centre, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyedeh Marzieh AhmadiDepartment of Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Saber Dehbani-ZadehDepartment of Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Anahita JafariMedical Imaging Research Centre, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Vyas AkondiDepartment of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Berhampur, Berhampur, Odisha 760010, India.
Sabyasachi ChatterjeeRetired Scientist from Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Tamil Nadu, India.
Seyed Alireza MirhosseiniStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Rezvan Ravanfar HaghighiMedical Imaging Research Centre, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a standard tool for diagnosing bone abnormalities. CT dose optimization is strongly recommended, due to the stochastic effects of x-ray. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT) imaging, reconstructed using an Iterative Reconstruction (IR) algorithm, in detecting bone trauma and disorders. Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, 71 patients with CT requests for spine or extremity (limb) bone underwent scanning using standard dose (SD) and ULD-CT protocols, in Shahid Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran from June 2019 to June 2020. The SD and ULD-CT protocols used 120 kVp and 80 kVp, respectively. The CT images were reconstructed using the standard and IR algorithms. CT dose indices, including the volume CT dose index (CTDI Results: The findings indicated that ULD-CT images accurately identified 113 out of 118 bone trauma and disorders. The quality of ULD-CT images received "very good", "good" and "acceptable" scores for both spine and extremity (limb) bones. The sensitivity and specificity of ULD-CT images for bone trauma and disorders were 67%-95% and 100%, respectively, with about a 98% dose reduction. Conclusion: The ULD-CT protocol for bone imaging achieved a remarkable dose reduction, while the image quality was reported as acceptable. Consequently, ULD-CT images reconstructed using an IR are suitable and can be tuned further in the future for acceptable use in patients with bone trauma and disorders.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageBone diseasesComputed tomography, multidetectorTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID40255228
PMCPMC12008661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.