ArticleGut and liver2025
Novel Risk Score for 30-Day Adverse Events Following Colonoscopy in Older Adults.
Article in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A double-edged sword in the very elderly: to screen or not to screen with colonoscopy?Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Balancing safety and effectiveness in colonoscopy for older adults: a narrative review.Intestinal research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Physicians are challenged with balancing benefits and risks of performing colonoscopies in older adults. We identified adverse event risk factors in this population and developed a predictive risk score for colonoscopy-related adverse events. Methods: From August 2017 to August 2022, 8,154 patients aged ≥60 years who underwent screening or diagnostic colonoscopies were enrolled at Gangnam Severance Hospital. The primary outcome was 30-day adverse events, defined as emergency room visits or unplanned hospitalizations post-colonoscopy. The frailty index calculated via laboratory findings (FI-LAB) was derived from blood test results and vital signs. A risk score was developed and categorized to predict colonoscopy-related adverse events. Data from 9,154 colonoscopies from September 2022 to December 2023 at two tertiary referral hospitals were used for internal and external validation. Results: The mean age was 67.9 years (range, 60 to 94 years). The 30-day adverse event rate was 1.4%. Adverse events were independently associated with the use of aspirin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.24), P2Y12 inhibitors (aOR, 1.79), and anticoagulants (aOR, 2.47) and with moderate (aOR, 4.54) and high (aOR, 11.40) FI-LABs. The incidence of adverse events in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 0.3%, 2.2%, and 10.7%, respectively (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the risk scores were 0.821, 0.856, and 0.757 for the derivation, internal, and external cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Colonoscopy-related adverse events in older adults were linked to frailty and medication use and were not dependent on age. This novel risk score supports personalized decision-making when performing colonoscopies in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.