Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254946›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2025

Global Legal Environment for LGBTQ+ Sexuality and Public Health.

Matthew M Kavanagh, Varsha Srivatsan, Florence Riako Anam, Ludo Bok, Luis Gil Abinader, Agrata Sharma, Catherine Grant, Yu Wei Chen, Sharonann Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew M KavanaghGeorgetown University, Washington, DCUSA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-4828
Varsha SrivatsanCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DCUSA.
Florence Riako AnamGlobal Network of People Living With HIV, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ludo BokUnited Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.
Luis Gil AbinaderCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DCUSA.
Agrata SharmaCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DCUSA.
Catherine GrantUnited Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.
Yu Wei ChenCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DCUSA.
Sharonann LynchCenter for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Washington, DCUSA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2023 the Supreme Court of Mauritius cited human rights and public health arguments to strike down a colonial-era law criminalizing consensual same-sex sex. The parliament of Singapore recently did the same through legislative means. Are these aberrations or a shifting global consensus? This article documents a remarkable shift international legal shift regarding LGBTQ+ sexuality. Analysis of laws from 194 countries across multiple years demonstrates a clear, ongoing trend toward decriminalization globally. Where most countries criminalized same-sex sexuality in the 1980s, now two-thirds of countries do not criminalize under law. Additionally, 28 criminalizing countries in 2024 demonstrate a de facto policy of non-enforcement, a milestone towards legal change that all of the countries that have fully decriminalized since 2017 have taken. This has important public health effects, with health law lessons for an era of multiple pandemics. But amidst this trend, the reverse is occurring in some countries, with a counter-trend toward deeper, harsher criminalization of LGBTQ+ sexuality. Case studies of Angola, Singapore, India, Botswana, Mauritius, Cook Islands, Gabon, and Antigua and Barbuda show many politically- and legally-viable pathways to decriminalization and highlight actors in the executive, legislative, and judicial arenas of government and civil society engaged in legal change.

Indexed as

discriminationHIVhuman rightsLGBT health

Identifiers

PMID40254946
PMCPMC12174810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.