ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025
Machine learning to improve HIV screening using routine data in Kenya.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Control of Infectious Diseases in the Post-COVID Era: Scoping Review.JMIR nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOptimal use of HIV testing resources accelerates progress towards ending HIV as a global threat. In Kenya, current testing practices yield a 2.8% positivity rate for new diagnoses reported through the national HIV electronic medical record (EMR) system. Increasingly, researchers have explored the potential for machine learning to improve the identification of people with undiagnosed HIV for referral for HIV testing. However, few studies have used routinely collected programme data as the basis for implementing a real-time clinical decision support system to improve HIV screening. In this study, we applied machine learning to routine programme data from Kenya's EMR to predict the probability that an individual seeking care is undiagnosed HIV positive and should be prioritized for testing.
methodsWe combined de-identified individual-level EMR data from 167,509 individuals without a previous HIV diagnosis who were tested between June and November 2022. We included demographics, clinical histories and HIV-relevant behavioural practices with open-source data that describes population-level behavioural practices as other variables in the model. We used multiple imputations to address high rates of missing data, selecting the optimal technique based on out-of-sample error. We generated a stratified 60-20-20 train-validate-test split to assess model generalizability. We trained four machine learning algorithms including logistic regression, Random Forest, AdaBoost and XGBoost. Models were evaluated using Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR), a metric that is well-suited to cases of class imbalance such as this, in which there are far more negative test results than positive.
resultsAll model types demonstrated predictive performance on the test set with AUCPR that exceeded the current positivity rate. XGBoost generated the greatest AUCPR, 10.5 times greater than the rate of positive test results.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that machine learning applied to routine HIV testing data may be used as a clinical decision support tool to refer persons for HIV testing. The resulting model could be integrated in the screening form of an EMR and used as a real-time decision support tool to inform testing decisions. Although issues of data quality and missing data remained, these challenges could be addressed using sound data preparation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.