Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254881›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Prioritization of Unknown LC-HRMS Features Based on Predicted Toxicity Categories.

Viktoriia Turkina, Jelle T Gringhuis, Sanne Boot, Annemieke Petrignani, Garry Corthals, Antonia Praetorius, Jake W O'Brien, Saer Samanipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Viktoriia TurkinaVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-2333
Jelle T GringhuisVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.
Sanne BootVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.
Annemieke PetrignaniVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-5867
Garry CorthalsVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.
Antonia PraetoriusInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0197-0116
Jake W O'BrienVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.
Saer SamanipourVan 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GD, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8270-6979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex environmental samples contain a diverse array of known and unknown constituents. While liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) nontargeted analysis (NTA) has emerged as an essential tool for the comprehensive study of such samples, the identification of individual constituents remains a significant challenge, primarily due to the vast number of detected features in each sample. To address this, prioritization strategies are frequently employed to narrow the focus to the most relevant features for further analysis. In this study, we developed a novel prioritization strategy that directly links fragmentation and chromatographic data to aquatic toxicity categories, bypassing the need for identification of individual compounds. Given that features are not always well-characterized through fragmentation, we created two models: (1) a Random Forest Classification (RFC) model, which classifies fish toxicity categories based on MS1, retention, and fragmentation data─expressed as cumulative neutral losses (CNLs)─when fragmentation information is available, and (2) a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) model that relies solely on retention time and MS1 data when fragmentation is absent. Both models demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of structure-based prediction methods. We further tested the models on a pesticide mixture in a tea extract measured by LC-HRMS, where the CNL-based RFC model achieved 0.76 accuracy and the KDE model reached 0.61, showcasing their robust performance in real-world applications.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsChromatography, LiquidFishesMass SpectrometryWater Pollutants, Chemicalecotoxicityhigh-resolution mass spectrometrymachine learningnontarget analysisprioritization

Identifiers

PMID40254881
PMCPMC12044687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.