ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Prioritization of Unknown LC-HRMS Features Based on Predicted Toxicity Categories.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the Discovery of Emerging Contaminants: A Leap in Technology and Data.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Molecular networking, conformal predictions and revised fingerprint-based models for discovering endocrine disruptors in mixtures.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Geographic authentication of premium tobacco extracts using machine learning models trained on LC-HRMS fingerprints.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Ionization efficiency prediction of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analytes based on molecular fingerprints and cumulative neutral losses.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex environmental samples contain a diverse array of known and unknown constituents. While liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) nontargeted analysis (NTA) has emerged as an essential tool for the comprehensive study of such samples, the identification of individual constituents remains a significant challenge, primarily due to the vast number of detected features in each sample. To address this, prioritization strategies are frequently employed to narrow the focus to the most relevant features for further analysis. In this study, we developed a novel prioritization strategy that directly links fragmentation and chromatographic data to aquatic toxicity categories, bypassing the need for identification of individual compounds. Given that features are not always well-characterized through fragmentation, we created two models: (1) a Random Forest Classification (RFC) model, which classifies fish toxicity categories based on MS1, retention, and fragmentation data─expressed as cumulative neutral losses (CNLs)─when fragmentation information is available, and (2) a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) model that relies solely on retention time and MS1 data when fragmentation is absent. Both models demonstrated accuracy comparable to that of structure-based prediction methods. We further tested the models on a pesticide mixture in a tea extract measured by LC-HRMS, where the CNL-based RFC model achieved 0.76 accuracy and the KDE model reached 0.61, showcasing their robust performance in real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.