Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254853›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Retention of 3-D-Printed, Milled, and Conventionally Fabricated Occlusal Splints.

Khalil Ibrahim Assiri, Nasser M Alqahtani, Mohamed Khaled Addas, Mohammad Zarbah, Ali Mosfer Alqahtani, Faisal Awad Aziz Alamri, Mudita Chaturvedi, Saurabh Chaturvedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khalil Ibrahim AssiriDepartment of Diagnostic Dental Sciences-Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser M AlqahtaniDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Khaled AddasDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad ZarbahDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Mosfer AlqahtaniDepartment of Diagnostic Dental Sciences-Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal Awad Aziz AlamriConsultant of Restorative Dentistry, Medical City, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mudita ChaturvediDepartment of Dental Research Cell, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Sant-Tukaram Nagar, Pune, India.
Saurabh ChaturvediDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dental occlusal splints (OSs) are intraoral devices routinely used for management of temporomandibular dysfunctions (TMD), bruxism, and occlusal instability and to reduce dental attrition and wear. There are limited data on retention of OSs. This study aimed to evaluate the retention of the occlusal splint samples fabricated by conventional, 3D-printed, and milled methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included total 120 samples divided into 3 groups: conventionally-fabricated (COSs), milled (MOSs), and 3D-printed OS (3DP OSs) (40 samples in each group). Retention was measured using an electronic vertical pull device. Splints were fabricated using standardized workflows, with a focus on uniform design and material and technique specifications. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test for group comparisons. RESULTS Retention forces significantly varied across the 3 groups (p<0.001). The recorded mean retentive forces in conventional, milled, and 3DP OSs were 16.4±4.94; 6.42±2.13; 4.42±1.53, respectively. Furthermore, Tukey's post hoc test was used for pairwise comparison among the groups, showing statistically significant differences (p<0.001) between the retentive forces for conventional and digitally fabricated OS. CONCLUSIONS The retentive force for the conventionally produced splints was more than those produced digitally. The results showed significant variations in retention between conventionally made, milled, and 3D-printed splints, with digitally-made OSs achieving clinically adequate retention to maintain its position without causing trauma to the oral structures.

Indexed as

Occlusal SplintsPrinting, Three-DimensionalHumans

Identifiers

PMID40254853
PMCPMC12023800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.