ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Retention of 3-D-Printed, Milled, and Conventionally Fabricated Occlusal Splints.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Aging and Its Impact on Surface Properties of Conventional and CAD-CAM Occlusal Splint Materials: An In Vitro Comparative Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Validating cephalometric angular reconstruction for determining vertical dimension in edentulous patients.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental occlusal splints (OSs) are intraoral devices routinely used for management of temporomandibular dysfunctions (TMD), bruxism, and occlusal instability and to reduce dental attrition and wear. There are limited data on retention of OSs. This study aimed to evaluate the retention of the occlusal splint samples fabricated by conventional, 3D-printed, and milled methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included total 120 samples divided into 3 groups: conventionally-fabricated (COSs), milled (MOSs), and 3D-printed OS (3DP OSs) (40 samples in each group). Retention was measured using an electronic vertical pull device. Splints were fabricated using standardized workflows, with a focus on uniform design and material and technique specifications. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test for group comparisons. RESULTS Retention forces significantly varied across the 3 groups (p<0.001). The recorded mean retentive forces in conventional, milled, and 3DP OSs were 16.4±4.94; 6.42±2.13; 4.42±1.53, respectively. Furthermore, Tukey's post hoc test was used for pairwise comparison among the groups, showing statistically significant differences (p<0.001) between the retentive forces for conventional and digitally fabricated OS. CONCLUSIONS The retentive force for the conventionally produced splints was more than those produced digitally. The results showed significant variations in retention between conventionally made, milled, and 3D-printed splints, with digitally-made OSs achieving clinically adequate retention to maintain its position without causing trauma to the oral structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.