Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254798›Full record

Trial reportClinical implant dentistry and related research2025

3D-Analysis of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Gain With Collagen Matrix and Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Control Trial.

Igor Ashurko, Svetlana Tarasenko, Mary Magdalyanova, Maxim Balyasin, Anna Galyas, Sabina Kazumyan, Nadiya Safi, Alexey Unkovskiy

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05870774 (Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Implants With Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05870774 nacompletednot on this map

Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Implants With Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Graft: 6-months Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled52ConditionsSoft Tissue AtrophyArmsSoft tissue augmentation with CTG, Soft tissue augmentation with CM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Igor AshurkoDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana TarasenkoDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Mary MagdalyanovaDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Maxim BalyasinDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna GalyasDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Sabina KazumyanDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Nadiya SafiDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey UnkovskiyDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-4251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the efficacy of the connective tissue graft (SCTG) and the collagen matrix (VXCM) in terms of soft tissue gain at the buccal site around a single implant.

methodsThe study was designed as a randomized, controlled clinical trial. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov with the identifier NCT05870774 and is accessible under the following link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05870774?term=NCT05870774&rank=1. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization. Patients with a single tooth gap and horizontal soft tissue thickness deficiency were enrolled in the study. Sites were randomly allocated to the control (SCTG) or test group (VXCM: Geistlich Fibro-Gide, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) to augment buccal soft tissue thickness. The primary outcome was soft tissue gain 3 months post-op. Secondary outcomes included soft tissue gain 6 months post-op, the pink aesthetic score (PES), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

resultsPatients' recruitment started on 28 October 2021 and ended on 25 December 2022. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and subjected to intervention. Sixteen patients were included per group. Three months post-op, soft tissue gain at the buccal site was 1.77 ± 0.61 mm in the VXCM group and 1.26 ± 0.41 mm in the SCTG group (p = 0.0003). Six months post-op, soft tissue gain was 1.11 ± 0.44 mm in the VXCM group and 1.43 ± 0.81 mm in the SCTG group (p = 0.0459). PROMs, including pain perception, favored the VXCM group. SCTG demonstrated favored results in PES.

conclusionSCTG remains the gold standard for increasing soft tissue thickness in terms of the clinical result.

Indexed as

CollagenConnective TissueDental Implants, Single-ToothImaging, Three-DimensionalAdultEsthetics, DentalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCollagenclinical researchimplantologyrandomized controlled trialsoft tissue grafting

Identifiers

PMID40254798
PMCPMC12010062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.