ReviewEuropean journal of sport science2025
Are Body Composition Estimates Affected by the Menstrual Cycle in Females With or Without Hormonal Contraception?-A Case-Control Study.
Review in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Nutrition Education on Dietary Intake and Body Composition Among Czech University Students Studying Nutrition and Food.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of body fat percentage in Emirati females: a comparative analysis of BIA vs. DXA.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormonal-induced water retention during the menstrual cycle (MC) may affect the estimates of body composition (BC) parameters depending on the MC phase if tissue hydration or volume is part of the BC analysis equations. Given this, MC phase-dependent changes of BC parameters might be expected within females for bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or air-displacement plethysmography (ADP), whereas skin-fold calipometry (CAL) might not be affected. This study aimed to evaluate BC analyses during a regular MC by means of BIA and ADP with CAL serving as a control method in females with or without hormonal contraception with males serving as a control group. In a case-control design with repeated measurements, BC was determined using BIA, ADP, and CAL in 54 participants (age 18-33; BMI 17.0-27.8) divided into females using hormonal contraceptives (HC) (n = 19), females using no-hormonal contraceptives (no-HC) (n = 17), and males (n = 18). BC was assessed on four cycle-related days (menstruation, late follicular, ovulation, and late luteal). There were only small intraindividual BC variations during the MC (CV% 0.5-5.2) and neither significant time effects within any group (p = 0.065-0.939) nor significant time*group interactions (p = 0.151-0.956) for all devices (BIA, ADP, CAL) in any BC parameter. The results indicate that hormonal-induced water retention, if any, during MC had no effect on BC estimates of ADP, BIA, and CAL or were too small to be identified neither in females with HC nor in females with no-HC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.