ArticleAmerican journal of men's health
Analysis of Current Status of Clinical Trial Registrations in Andrological Diseases: Insights from ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP Databases.
Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A literature review and reflection on clinical trials: current challenges, future directions, and potential strategies to overcome practical barriers.AME clinical trials review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the registration information and outcome transparency for five common andrological diseases, as well as the factors influencing result availability. A comprehensive search was performed on ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to retrieve all clinical trial registration data related to the five defined andrological diseases from the inception of these databases up to September 1, 2024. The search extracted key trial details, including status, type, intervention, and result availability. Of 8,132 trials retrieved, 642 were analyzed. Among these, 259 trials (40.34%) reported results via ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, or publications, while 113 trials (17.60%) made results publicly available on ClinicalTrials.gov or ICTRP. Among the five andrological diseases, male infertility had the highest rate of result availability (37/74, 50%), whereas benign prostatic hyperplasia exhibited the lowest (71/190, 37.37%). No significant differences were found across diseases (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.