ArticleScientific reports2025
Hyperspectral leaf reflectance simulation considering internal structure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning surrogate for the leaf PROSPECT-D model and its applications across plant species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging UAV hyperspectral imaging for crop physiology and biochemistry: A comprehensive review of feature extraction and selection methods.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Integrating UAV visible and multispectral imagery to assess grazing-induced vegetation responses in sandy grasslands.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mainstream radiation transport models represented by the PROSPECT model regard the internal substances of the leaf as uniformly distributed. The influence of the uneven distribution of substances inside the leaf on the spectra of the leaf was not considered. The PIOSL-3 model proposed in this study assumes that the leaf is composed of three layers of optical properties. The particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) was used to determine the distribution proportion of biochemical parameters including chlorophyll, water and dry matter in each layer of leaves. In this paper, the LOPEX and ANGERS datasets were used to verify the spectral simulation effect of the PIOSL-3 model, and it can be seen from the optimization results of the parameters that the structural parameters in the leaves of different plant types are higher in the upper layer, and the distribution of chlorophyll also shows similar characteristics, while water and dry matter mainly exist in the lower layer of the leaves, and some plants also show different characteristics. In terms of simulated spectra, the PIOSL-3 model reduced RMSE mean values by 1.78, 0.39, 6.12, and 0.9, and SAM mean values by 0.07, 0.0094, 0.2267, and 0.03 compared to the PROSPECT model on the LOPEX and ANGERS datasets, respectively. The hypothesis of layered simulation is feasible, and the proposal of PIOSL-3 model provides a new idea for modeling the leaf radiation transmission process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.