ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
A Deep Learning Survival Model for Evaluating the Survival Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning can assess the individual survival prognosis in sizeable datasets with intricate underlying processes. However, studies exploring the performance of deep learning survival in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are lacking. This study aimed to construct a deep learning model based on clinical risk factors for survival prediction in patients with PTC.
methodsA Cox proportional hazards deep neural network (DeepSurv) was developed and validated by using consecutive patients with PTC from 17 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) cancer registries (2000-2020). The performance of the DeepSurv model was further validated on two external test datasets from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using the survival risk scores at 10 years predicted by the DeepSurv model, we classified patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups and explored their overall survival (OS).
resultsThe concordance index of the DeepSurv model for predicting OS was 0.798 in the SEER test dataset, 0.893 in the MDACC dataset, and 0.848 in the TCGA dataset. The DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the survival risk scores at 10 years. Patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse OS than patients in the low-risk group in all three test datasets (all P < 0.001).
conclusionThe DeepSurv model was capable of classifying patients with PTC into low-risk and high-risk groups, which may provide important prognostic information for personalized treatment in patients with PTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40254654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.