Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254641›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025

Strengthening Rigor and Reproducibility in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies of Social Exposures and Brain-Based Health Outcomes.

Brooke G McKenna, Alexandre A Lussier, Matthew J Suderman, Esther Walton, Andrew J Simpkin, Anke Hüls, Erin C Dunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brooke G McKennaCenter for Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. mckenn34@purdue.edu.
Alexandre A LussierCenter for Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew J SudermanMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Esther WaltonDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Andrew J SimpkinSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Anke HülsRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Erin C DunnCenter for Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

IMPACT-ADRD: Investigating the Multi-omics Perturbations Associated with Complex Environmental Toxicants and their Contribution to Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasU01AG088425 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Anke Huels, Donghai Liang · 2024 to 2026
$6.8M
Childhood adversity, DNA methylation, and risk for depression: A longitudinal study of sensitive periods in developmentR01MH113930 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Erin Cathleen Dunn · 2017 to 2026
$6.6M
Air pollution and early signs of dementiaR01AG079170 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Anke Huels, Thomas Spurgeon Wingo · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 848158, EarlyCauseMedical Research Council MC_UU_00011/5MQ Fellows Award MQF22\9NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079170NIA NIH HHS R01AG079170NIA NIH HHS U01 AG088425NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113930NIMH NIH HHS R01MH113930UK Research and Innovation EP/Y015037/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewStudies examining the effects of social factors on the epigenome have proliferated over the last two decades. Social epigenetics research to date has broadly demonstrated that social factors spanning childhood adversity, to neighborhood disadvantage, educational attainment, and economic instability are associated with alterations to DNA methylation that may have a functional impact on health. These relationships are particularly relevant to brain-based health outcomes such as psychiatric disorders, which are strongly influenced by social exposures and are also the leading cause of disability worldwide. However, social epigenetics studies are limited by the many challenges faced by both epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and the study of social factors.

findingsIn this manuscript, we provide a framework to achieve greater rigor and reproducibility in social epigenetics research. We discuss current limitations of the social epigenetics field, as well as existing and new solutions to improve rigor and reproducibility. Readers will gain a better understanding of the current considerations and processes that could maximize rigor when conducting social epigenetics research, as well as the technologies and approaches that merit attention and investment to propel continued discovery into the future.

Indexed as

BrainEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeEpigenomicsGenome-Wide Association StudyDNA MethylationHumansReproducibility of ResultsDNA methylationEWASReproducibilityRigorSocial determinants of healthSocial epigenetics

Identifiers

PMID40254641
PMCPMC12009779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.