ArticleScientific reports2025
Simultaneously capturing excessive variations and smooth dynamics of the underlying neural activity using spatiotemporal basis expansion and multisubject fMRI data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structured dissociative PCA methods for high dimensional neuroimaging signal decomposition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the last decade, dictionary learning (DL) has gained popularity over independent component analysis (ICA) within the blind source separation (BSS) framework for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals. Despite its rising popularity, a primary challenge in DL remains model fitting. It is susceptible to overfitting because the conventional loss function strives to correspond too closely to the training data. However, in the case of multi-subject (MS) analysis, it becomes imperative to overfit in order to acquire the source diversities across different brains. In this paper, an attempt has been made to resolve this predicament by concurrently preserving and mitigating the effect of high variance. A novel algorithm named joint analysis and synthesis DL (JASDL) has been proposed that simultaneously learns the overfitted trends to retain the data-centric cross-subject diversities and wellfitted trends by adequately regularizing the model complexity. This fusion was achieved by benefiting from modeling each subject's data in terms of both spatiotemporal (ST) prior information (PI) and MS-ST components. The PI consisted of biological priors derived from neuroscience knowledge, such as brain network templates, and mathematical priors derived from basis functions, such as three-dimensional (3D) cubic basis splines (B-splines). In contrast, MS-ST components were estimated using the computationally most parsimonious sparse ST blind source separation (ssBSS) method. Using the proposed analysis/synthesis cost function that exploits tri and quad-factorization for matrix approximation, the JASDL algorithm can model temporal smoothness and spatial reduction of false positives while retaining MS variations. Its efficacy was evaluated by comparing it with existing DL techniques using both experimental and synthetic fMRI datasets. Overall, the mean of correlation and F-score was found to be [Formula: see text] higher for the JASDL synthesis dictionary than the state-of-the-art subject-wise sequential DL (swsDL).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.