Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254629›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Design and psychometric evaluation of the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS): a mixed-method study.

Fateme Mohammadi, Rasoul Salimi, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Salman Khazaei, Mostafa Bijani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fateme MohammadiChronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center and Autism Spectrum Disorders Research Center, Department of Nursing, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Rasoul SalimiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mohammadreza ShokouhiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Health Research Center for Health Sciences. Health Sciences & Technology Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Salman KhazaeiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Health Research Center for Health Sciences. Health Sciences & Technology Research Institute, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mostafa BijaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran. bizhani_mostafa@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding safe care by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel at the stressful scene of an incident is one of the most crucial factors influencing the preservation and enhancement of patient health. However, culture, attitudes, and social norms can influence the provision of care at the scene of an accident. Consequently, evaluating safe care practices at incident scenes is imperative and necessitates a specialized assessment tool. Presently, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments for measuring safe care practices among EMS personnel. Therefore, this study was designed and conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS).

methodsThis investigation employed a mixed-methods design with a sequential exploratory approach, conducted from January 2024 onwards across the southwestern, western, and southeastern regions of Iran. The study was bifurcated into two distinct phases. In the initial phase, a conventional content analysis method was employed to scrutinize the narratives elicited from 41 EMS personnel. In the subsequent phase, the instrument's validity and reliability were rigorously assessed.

resultsSafe care provided by EMS personnel was defined as the management of the incident scene, efficient clinical skills, and effective interaction aimed at delivering principled and safe patient care. Subsequently, based on the derived conceptual framework, a safe care instrument was designed with 44 items across three dimensions. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity 11 items, and face validity 3 items were deleted. Exploratory and confirmatory validity of this scale was approved in three dimensions: "incident scene management" (12 items), "efficient clinical skills" (10 items), and "effective interaction" (8 items). The scale's reliability was reported at 0.95 using Cronbach's alpha method.

conclusionThe Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS), demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Consequently, senior managers in pre-hospital emergency services can utilize this instrument to evaluate safe care practices among pre-hospital emergency medical technicians. They can identify the most appropriate strategies, including educational interventions, to enhance safe care provision at incident scenes when necessary. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesPatient SafetyPsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEemergency medical servicesPre-hospitalPsychometric evaluationSafety managementScale

Identifiers

PMID40254629
PMCPMC12010613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.