Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254614›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Flood risk susceptibility analysis in Larkana district Pakistan using multi criteria decision analysis and geospatial techniques.

Waheed Ali Khoso, Muhammad Waseem, Muhammad Ashraf Tanoli, Faisal Baig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Waheed Ali KhosoDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, 23640, Pakistan.
Muhammad WaseemDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, 23640, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ashraf TanoliDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, 23640, Pakistan.
Faisal BaigNational Water and Energy Center, UAE University, AlAin, UAE. faisalbaig@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most devastating natural disasters in worldwide, with significant socioeconomic and environmental impacts. In such a scenario, flood susceptibility analysis is essential for successful risk management and disaster preparedness. The Larkana district located in densely populated area of Sindh province, approximately 1.8 million population with 0.32 million households, is highly susceptible to floods due to its geographical location, river systems, and hot climatic patterns with extremely high temperature in summer and mild winter. Larkana district often faces significant flood risks mainly due to monsoon rains and the overflow of the Indus River which often lead to widespread flooding. The research aims to identify and quantify key flood risk factors, including rainfall pattern, distance to river, topography, land use/land cover, soil texture, vegetation index, and drainage infrastructure. AHP was applied to prioritize these risk factors based on expert opinions and their relative significance in contributing to flood vulnerability. GIS employed for spatial analysis and mapping of risk zones, allowing for detailed visualization of high-risk areas across the district. For this study, the various data sources such as topographic data, land use and landcover information, rainfall and infrastructure data, were used to develop a comprehensive flood susceptibility model. The AHP method was employed to determine the relative weights with consistency ratio (CR) and GIS techniques to generate flood susceptibility maps by considering all nine flood risk factors. Flood risk levels were further classified into five different classes as very low, low, moderate, high and very high. By using AHP, the weights of each parameter were calculated as a percentage, and it was determined that four out of nine parameters had 79% impact on flood hazard. These factors are ranked as the most influential factors in flood hazards for study area, with rainfall, distance to river, slope, and elevation having the greatest influences, while LULC, TWI, NDVI, soil type, and curvature had 21% impacts, much less impact as compared to top ranked parameters. After that, each flood risk parameter maps were reclassified. These maps were superimposed by weighted overlay maps in order to show that 7.65% of the entire area is at very high flood risk, 63.89% is at high risk, 28.38% is at moderate risk, and 0.12% is at low risk. The findings and established complete flood susceptibility model will facilitate policymakers and disaster management authorities by identifying high-risk locations and prioritizing mitigation measures, ultimately reducing the impact of floods on local communities and infrastructure in Larkana district.

Indexed as

AHP analysisFlood risk managementFlood susceptibilityGeospatial analysisLarkana districtWatershed

Identifiers

PMID40254614
PMCPMC12009972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.