Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254573›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2025

Histology-resolved proteomics reveals distinct tumor and stromal profiles in low- and high-grade prostate cancer.

Allison L Hunt, Waleed Barakat, Sasha C Makohon-Moore, Brian L Hood, Kelly A Conrads, Katlin N Wilson, Tamara Abulez, Jonathan Ogata, Kenneth J Pienta, Tamara L Lotan and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Allison L HuntWomen's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, 3289 Woodburn Rd, Annandale, VA, 22003, USA.
Waleed BarakatGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Sasha C Makohon-MooreGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Brian L HoodGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Kelly A ConradsGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Katlin N WilsonGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Tamara AbulezGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Jonathan OgataGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Kenneth J PientaThe Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tamara L LotanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Haresh ManiDepartment of Pathology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Donald L TrumpInova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Health System, 8081 Innovation Park Dr, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
Nicholas W BatemanGynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.
Thomas P ConradsWomen's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, 3289 Woodburn Rd, Annandale, VA, 22003, USA. thomas.conrads@inova.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in men. Prostate tumor staging and disease aggressiveness are evaluated based on the Gleason scoring system, which is further used to direct clinical intervention. The Gleason scoring system provides an estimate of tumor aggressiveness through quantitation of the serum level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and histologic assessment of Grade Group, determined by the Gleason Grade of the tumor specimen.

methodsTo improve our understanding of the proteomic characteristics differentiating low- versus high-grade prostate cancer tumors, we performed a deep proteomic characterization of laser microdissected epithelial and stromal subpopulations from surgically resected tissue specimens from patients with Gleason 6 (n = 23 specimens from n = 15 patients) and Gleason 9 (n = 15 specimens from n = 15 patients) prostate cancer via quantitative high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis.

resultsIn total, 789 and 295 grade-specific significantly altered proteins were quantified in the tumor epithelium and tumor-involved stroma, respectively. Benign epithelial and stromal populations were not inherently different between Gleason 6 versus Gleason 9 specimens. Notably, 598 proteins were exclusively significantly altered between Gleason 9 (but not Gleason 6) tumor-involved stroma and benign stroma, including several proteins involved in cholesterol biosynthesis and nucleotide metabolism.

conclusionsProteomic alterations between Gleason 6 versus Gleason 9 were exclusive to the disease microenvironment, observed in both the tumor epithelium and tumor-involved stroma. Further, the molecular alterations measured in the tumor-involved stroma from Gleason 9 cases relative to the benign stroma have unique significance in disease aggressiveness, development, and/or progression. Our data provide supportive evidence of a need for further investigations into targeting stromal reservoirs of cholesterol and/or deoxynucleoside triphosphates in PCa tumors and further highlight the necessity for independent examination of the TME epithelial and stromal compartments.

Indexed as

Laser microdissectionProstate cancerProteomicsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40254573
PMCPMC12009531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.