Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40254572›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

Oncologic outcomes of surgically treated colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Soo Young Oh, Jung Yun Park, Kwan Mo Yang, Seong-A Jeong, Yong Jae Kwon, Yun Tae Jung, Chung Hyeun Ma, Keong Won Yun, Kwang Hyun Yoon, Jae Young Kwak and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Periodontitis, colorectal cancer and associated factors: A cross-sectional study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soo Young OhDepartment of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung Yun ParkDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Kwan Mo YangDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. rhksah27@gmail.com.
Seong-A JeongDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Yong Jae KwonDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Yun Tae JungDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Chung Hyeun MaDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Keong Won YunDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Hyun YoonDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Jae Young KwakDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Chang Sik YuDepartment of Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOctogenarians constitute a growing number of diagnoses for colorectal cancer. However, the optimal treatment for these increasingly vulnerable octogenarians with colorectal cancer remains a challenging issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of colorectal cancer, comparing octogenarians (> 80 years) and younger age (60-79 years).

methodsA total of 657 patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2019 at Gangneung asan hospital. Among them, 444 patients over the age of 60 were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were as follows: only local resection, R1 and R2 resection, Stage IV, absence of data in follow-up, concurrent inflammatory bowel disease, concurrent malignancy, and prior history of malignancy. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: Octogenarian group (OG, aged > 80 years, n = 83), and younger group (YG, aged 60 to 79 years, n = 361). Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) was used to control for confounding factors.

resultsWe used Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) to control confounding factors and ensure a balanced comparison between octogenarians (OG) and younger patients (YG). Before IPTW adjustment, the OG had significantly worse 3-year overall survival (90.0% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.045), while 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between YG and OG (87.8% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.349). Additionally, the OG had a higher rate of emergency surgery (21.7% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.020), higher ASA classification (≥ III in 66.3% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.006), higher overall mortality (43.4% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001), and less frequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy (17.2% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.177, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.452-3.264, p < 0.001), emergency surgery (HR = 1.831, 95% CI: 1.157-2.897, p = 0.010), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V. HR = 1.357, 95% CI: 1.035-1.779, p = 0.027), higher TNM stage (stage III, HR = 5.143, 95% CI: 2.009-13.167, p < 0.001), and presence of perineural invasion (HR = 1.588, 95% CI: 1.058-2.385, p = 0.026) were significant predictors of worse survival. Similarly, independent factors associated with recurrence included emergency surgery (HR = 2.653, 95% CI: 1.550-4.542, p < 0.001), poor tumor differentiation (HR = 2.842, 95% CI: 1.198-6.743, p = 0.018), higher TNM stage (stage III, HR = 7.826, 95% CI: 2.355-26.016, p < 0.001), and presence of perineural invasion (HR = 1.876, 95% CI: 1.152-3.055, p = 0.011). However, age was not an independent factor associated with recurrence. In the subgroup analysis, the OG group with no or mild complications (Clavien-Dindo classification I-II) had a significantly better 3-year OS compared to those with severe complications (87.7% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.002). After IPTW adjustment, there were no significant differences in OS (73.2% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.120) or DFS (87.2% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.863) between the two groups. These findings suggest that age alone is not a critical determinant of oncologic outcomes once confounding variables are controlled.

conclusionAfter IPTW adjustment, age was not an independent factor affecting oncologic outcomes. Instead, emergency surgery, severe complications, advanced stage, tumor differentiation, and perineural invasion were significant predictors of survival and recurrence. In the subgroup analysis, octogenarians with no or mild complications had significantly better 3-year OS than those with severe complications. These findings suggest that perioperative management and disease severity, rather than age alone, should guide treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectalOctogenarianOncologic outcomeSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40254572
PMCPMC12010669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.